British Journal of Visual Impairment

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
British Journal of Visual Impairment, Vol. 10, No. 3, 83-87 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/026461969201000303

Information used in rehabilitation decisions: some research results

Adrian R. Hill

Peter A. Aspinall

Richard Greenwood

This paper describes the results of a research programme (1988-89) directed at determining what information is used by the staff in social services departments responsible for making decisions about the rehabilitation of visually handicapped people. Four principal categories of information were identified: personality and aptitude traits; level of social and financial support; general health (including age); and aspects of visual function. The first two sources of information accounted for 65% of discriminations made for alternative course of action in rehabilitation, while information about visual function was the least frequently used (i.e. 11%). There was no evidence that informa tion about a patient/client's clinical diagnosis was used in decision-making about rehabilitation. The results of this study were used to assist redrafting of the revised BD8 (1990) form.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
British Journal of Visual ImpairmentHome page
A. R. Hill
Vision Welfare: Inter-Professional Co-operation or Fragmentation?
British Journal of Visual Impairment, September 1, 1999; 17(3): 105 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Visual ImpairmentHome page
A. G. Dodds
Dear Editors
British Journal of Visual Impairment, July 1, 1993; 11(2): 73 - 73.
[PDF]